If anyone attempts to, or enters my property or house, they will die. If anyone tries to rob a bank, they will die if the guards are alert. The presence of armed guards, cameras, and other bric-a-brac in a bank, WARNS potential robbers what may happen if the try to commit the crime. In Los Angeles, every day, there are high speed chases, which are often on TV for the entertainment of viewers. The chasing cops with flashing lights, and sirens, WARN the fleeing perp. that he is in trouble. If there is a violent person who has been stopped, they may die, but not before they are WARNED by the police. Cops are armed, and my house is fully loaded with cameras on 24 hours a day, alarms, and there are guns everywhere. All my doors show that not only am I alarmed, but armed and a life member of NRA and GOA. There are lights around the house that come on automatically at night. I am WARNING potential criminals, if they mess with me, they may die. (Colorado has a ’make my day’ law). Banks have sophisticated alarm systems, and if a would be robber pulls a gun on a teller, guards will shoot him, after the posted and obvious WARNINGS. All very simple. People, burglars, robbers, or what have you, are WARNED what may happen if they trespass my house, a bank, or other business or residence.
Today, Arizona has tried to stop the huge influx of illegals, who come here, and commit heinous crimes, besides milking our economy dry. The ACLU thinks that stopping the illegals is inhumane. Obama refuses to seal the borders, as do the Democrats. The illegals are trespassing into our nation. Is there any difference between trespassing into our nation, or trespassing into our home, farm, ranch, business, or bank? Is there any reason on God’s Green Earth, why illegals should not be stopped 100% of the time? Millions every year cross our borders with total impunity, and harm us, bankrupt us, steal our jobs, rape our women, and commit all sorts of atrocities. A few are picked up, and convicted of crimes, and after doing their time, they are released back among us, to do more damage.
On the highway, speed limits, detours, bad paving, one way, steep hills, sharp curves, railroad crossings, and others are posted, as a WARNING. A warning that if you disobey, you might get a ticket or be in trouble of some sort. (Stop protecting me from myself with motorcycle helmet and seat belt laws. It’s my decision, not yours). Stores post WARNING signs against shoplifters. Airlines have WARNINGS about seat belts being fastened, although why they want you to have to keep them on after touching down, beats me. Wet Paint signs WARN, as do No Swimming signs WARN. The list could go on and on, but WARNING signs mean what they say…except for illegals crossing into the U.S., if indeed there are signs warning about this.
It is absolutely necessary to WARN illegals before they attempt to cross into America. The only warnings they get are a fence, or not even a fence in places. Now, if a trespasser into America is WARNED before they attempt to cross, what happens to them if they do so, is their responsibility. At least that’s the way I feel about it. I am certain many do not agree, and especially the ACLU, illegals already here, Obama, most Democrats and liberals. My columns don’t appeal to them anyway.
Suppose there were plain, obvious, impossible to miss, WARNINGS, to the would be crossers of the border into the United States? If all interlopers were sufficiently WARNED that if they were caught, they might be shot, would they cross? “Surveillance” by pilotless air drones keeps no one out, and is a total waste of money, as are photos of crossovers, radar, etc.
In a 1955 movie titled “Man With The Gun,” the sheriff, played by Robert Mitchum, posted a sign in his town that said, “NO WEARING GUNS. VIOLATORS WILL BE SHOT.” Of course, it was only a movie, but it makes sense.
In my opinion, all illegals could be stopped, if huge signs in Spanish were posted on both sides of borders, and illuminated at night, which would say, DO NOT CROSS INTO THE UNITED STATES. IF YOU DO, YOU MAY BE SHOT.” There should be sound systems, broadcasting the same message for all to hear, 24/7, and Mexican TV stations should have the same warnings, perhaps paid for by the U.S. Enough signs, commercials, and loudspeakers, so that none could miss them. All illegals then, could be shot as they crossed, if any dared to do so. This is OUR LAND, not theirs, and like we protect our homes, stores, banks, ranches, farms, and other property, we warn criminals of all kinds, not to commit a crime. Illegals crossing into the United States, are criminals, just like a rapist, or bank robber. Shoot them, I say. Keep them OUT. We don’t want them and their pregnant females wanting to give birth here so their offspring will be automatic citizens. We don’t want them invading privately owned ranches near the borders, leaving trash, and on at least one occasion killing a property owner as they pass through.
Does anyone have enough guts to WARN all illegals that they might be shot if they enter here? Of course not. America is full of wimps and weaklings with no guts or goals. Could someone be shot robbing a bank, or entering a home to rob? It happens every day. So why not shoot someone trespassing into OUR NATION? Or is just better to not stop them, warn them, or in any way interfere, and give them all sorts of benefits, welfare, free medical care, food stamps and schooling? You decide, but my idea would stop it totally. You take a chance when you ignore a WARNING, in every situation. Why not WARN potential illegals, and make it a true statement?
Am I advocating shooting thousands of illegals? Of course not! I am advocating WARNING them, and making the warning come true if any are so stupid as to try it. I’m not a sky diver or bungee jumper, because I’m scared to do it. If warnings to illegals had real meaning, 99% of them wouldn’t try it. 40,000 die in traffic accidents every year, and millions are killed in stupid wars. A few dead trespassers who were warned? Why not? The problem would be solved instantly, and at microscopic cost.
P.S. Yesterday, I went to a Burger King, for my favorite hamburger, the ’Whopper.’ I had my two small dogs with me, and I thought I’d get them a treat, so I ordered a dollar size chicken bits thing, with four pieces of chicken in a little bag. When I got back to the car, they were all excited about the treat I had gotten for them. One dog sniffed them, and refused. “It’s chicken, dummy,” I explained. The other dog sniffed, and reluctantly ate one and a half. She promptly threw up, and when we got home, she stayed in the yard, throwing up the rest of Burger King’s chicken morsels and probably most of what else she had eaten that day. Now, if a dog can’t hold them down or won’t eat them, why should humans eat them? What in the world is in them? I think Burger King needs to explain, but in the mean time, stay away from them.
P.S. to P.S. We’re going on another cruise! This time a 14 day one to Alaska on Holland America’s MS Amsterdam. My last day here will be Friday, August 20th. I’ll be back September 8 or 9. Both my kids will be here to serve you while I’m away.